PoSH legal insights: Part IV
Part IV: Landmark judgments shaping PoSH implementation, including employer liability for third-party harassment & compensation benchmarks.
PoSH legal insights: Part IV Read More »
Part IV: Landmark judgments shaping PoSH implementation, including employer liability for third-party harassment & compensation benchmarks.
PoSH legal insights: Part IV Read More »
Part III: Critical procedural aspects – handling anonymous complaints, electronic evidence validity & IC’s quasi-judicial powers during inquiries.
PoSH legal insights: Part III Read More »
Part II: Analysing employer obligations beyond IC formation – mandatory training, policy dissemination & annual report compliance mechanisms.
PoSH legal insights: Part II Read More »
Consent in PoSH: Focus on complainant’s expressed unwillingness, not implied permission. Past relationships or silence don’t equal ongoing consent.
Understanding the role of consent: PoSH inquiry Read More »
Character evidence (“he’s a family man”/”she’s provocative”) is inadmissible in PoSH inquiries, which focus solely on incident-specific facts.
The irrelevance of character testimonies in sexual harassment cases Read More »
IC recommends disciplinary action proportionate to harassment severity. Final implementation rests with the employer, but non-compliance risks legal challenge.
Disciplinary issue in a PoSH case: Role of the IC Read More »